Dion Hinchcliff in his Architectures of Participation has discussed in detail about the collective intelligence of Myspace and YouTube the two big web 2.0 or social software sites that dominate the market. He also mulls about whether the sites should care about the quality rather than the site traffic to sustain the growth and user attraction. But in my opinion it is difficult to police the user content and it is a free flow of information that is used may to show off or to interact with the friends etc., Either case it seems to be the era of social software and you could see wars being fought for taking the top spot as Dion elaborates that YouTube and MySpace are becoming top sites by taking turns.
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, August 2nd, 2006 at 8:03 am and is filed under web 2.0.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.
Dion Hinchcliff in his Architectures of Participation has discussed in detail about the collective intelligence of Myspace and YouTube the two big web 2.0 or social software sites that dominate the market. He also mulls about whether the sites should care about the quality rather than the site traffic to sustain the growth and user attraction. But in my opinion it is difficult to police the user content and it is a free flow of information that is used may to show off or to interact with the friends etc., Either case it seems to be the era of social software and you could see wars being fought for taking the top spot as Dion elaborates that YouTube and MySpace are becoming top sites by taking turns.
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, August 2nd, 2006 at 8:03 am and is filed under web 2.0.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.